Side by side
SiftWP and Wordfence compared
| SiftWP | Wordfence | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it runs | Outside WordPress, over SSH | Inside WordPress, as a plugin |
| Firewall | None | An endpoint firewall that runs within WordPress, according to Wordfence |
| Scanning | Weekly. Core files, database, uploads and malware patterns, with an agent investigating each finding | Scheduled scans of core, plugin and theme files, plus malware signatures |
| Free versus paid freshness | The same checks on every plan | Wordfence says free users get new firewall rules and malware signatures 30 days after Premium users |
| After a finding | Safe fixes applied and files quarantined. Risky changes wait for your approval. | You review the scan results and act on them. Check Wordfence's documentation for its repair options. |
| Login protection | Not included | Two-factor authentication and login rate limiting |
| Server load | None on page views | Runs inside WordPress, so scans and the firewall use your site's resources |
| Pricing | $9, $29 or $49 per site per month, with 100 free credits to start | A free plan and a paid Premium plan. Confirm current prices on Wordfence's site. |
Which part of Wordfence do you want to replace?
Wordfence bundles three jobs in one plugin, and a Wordfence alternative usually replaces only one of them.
- The firewall. SiftWP does not replace it. SiftWP does not filter traffic.
- The malware scanner. SiftWP can replace it. It reads files and the database from the server each week, and an agent investigates each finding instead of only listing it.
- Login protection. SiftWP does not replace two-factor authentication or login rate limiting. Keep something for that.
Where Wordfence is stronger
- Firewall and login security in one free plugin. You get blocking, rate limiting and two-factor authentication without paying.
- Real-time protection on Premium. New rules arrive as they are released. SiftWP checks weekly and cannot block an attack as it happens.
- A large community. Many hosts, guides and support answers assume Wordfence.
Where SiftWP is stronger
- Nothing to install in WordPress. There is no plugin to update, configure or keep running on every page load.
- Investigation, not a list. A match for a function like
evalis often legitimate plugin code, so the agent reads the file before judging it. - Approvals for risky changes. Safe fixes are applied automatically. Deactivating a plugin you may rely on waits for your yes, and every action is logged.
- Nothing deleted. Suspicious files are quarantined and can be restored.
- A ready message for your host. When the fix is outside WordPress, such as an SSL or Apache issue, it drafts the exact request to send.
Before you remove Wordfence
You do not have to switch in one step. A safer order:
- Run both for a few weeks. SiftWP installs nothing in WordPress, so the two do not conflict. Compare what each one finds.
- Decide whether you still want the firewall. If you do, keep Wordfence for that job, or choose another firewall.
- Remove Extended Protection first, if you turned it on. Wordfence can load its firewall through a PHP setting that points to a file inside the plugin. Remove it from Wordfence's firewall settings before you delete the plugin, or PHP may keep looking for a file that no longer exists.
Which fits you
Which one fits your site?
Choose Wordfence if...
- You want a free firewall and login protection inside the WordPress dashboard
- You are comfortable reviewing scan results and acting on them yourself
- You want real-time protection and are willing to pay for Premium
Choose SiftWP if...
- You do not want another plugin on your site
- You want findings investigated and the safe ones fixed for you, with approvals for the rest
- You manage sites for clients and want a ready message for the host when a problem is outside WordPress